40k Rules Clarifications

Un filmulet dragut care explica foarte bine cum functioneaza grenadele:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc8l78qBWPA&feature=related

Filmuletul e chiar OK pt. a prezenta cum se folosesc grenadele. Nu e totdeauna clar pt. cineva la inceput.

P.S.: Berzerker-ul pe javra aia e gay rau de tot LOL.

Da. Total fara relevanta, I just hacked some Firewarriors today, intr-un "meci" de 200 de puncte.

And since pics or it didn't happen:

Ultimii trei or fugit de pe masa, intr-un stil foarte tipic. Gramada de sange din stanga e un squad de FW care o luat sweeping de la doi marines.

As I was expecting:

"To clarify:
if a unit is made up of all the same armor save, roll all your armor saves at once and being allocated unsaved wounds to the closest models. If such an unsaved wound reaches a character, they must take their LoS then or forego such an option. If it passes, continue making such rolls on the character until it fails enough to die or there are no more unsaved wounds.
if a units is made up of different armor saves, allocate wounds as you would normally and then take saves. If such allocation reaches a character, they must take their LoS then (BEFORE they roll their own save) or forego such an option. If the character passes, continue making such rolls or their own armor save rolls, until the character is dead or there are no more wounds to be allocated."

Mda. Pare o interpretare OK pt. a grabi un pic lucrurile.

Numai sa fie de acord si restul, aici pe plan local.

@ Cipi, cum e Brunner? Gatashi?

Putting on the dummy hat. So we should have checked the Master of Ordnance rules. They say that if the dice is a hit then it scatters 2d6, if a miss then 3d6 and if he has LOS then he substracts his BS from the result. Why do we always fuck up the rules for this guy? We always remember it wrong. Tipul asta e ca si faza cu Terminators and firing heavy weapons after they move -back in 4th ed days.

And he has BS 4, not 5. However at least we've been using the blast ok since it's Ordnance Barrage.

Garak a scris:Putting on the dummy hat. So we should have checked the Master of Ordnance rules. They say that if the dice is a hit then it scatters 2d6, if a miss then 3d6 and if he has LOS then he substracts his BS from the result. Why do we always fuck up the rules for this guy? We always remember it wrong. Tipul asta e ca si faza cu Terminators and firing heavy weapons after they move -back in 4th ed days.

And he has BS 4, not 5. However at least we've been using the blast ok since it's Ordnance Barrage.

ROFL. True that.

La fel cu sorc-ul meu. Era T5 de la bike. Dar eu i-am acceptat insta gib de la demo charge...si sunt sigur ca noi am mai f*cked up some other rules also....oh well, it was still some epic battle. Twisted Evil

All righty then. Am mai citit un pic niste reguli pt. ca prea mi se pareau unele din ele imba (Flying MC's si Vector Strikes against vehicles) si as vrea sa le carific aici pt. a evita orice folosire gresita in viitor.

1. Jump Infantry.
Jump move in movement da 12" and flying over everything. Difficult terrain treated as dangerous terrain.
Jump Move in assault da re-roll pt. distanta de charge si hammer of wrath (1 atac la strength-ul modelului la initiativa 10).

The trick is, you can use only one jump move per turn. Sooo either 12" move and normal charge or normal movement and special re-roll hammer of wrath charge.

Mmmmmm, that just reduced the usefulness of jump infantry a bit.

2. Flying Monstrous Creatures
Dupa cele intamplate in meciul trecut cand Demon prince-ul a rape-uit o Vendetta si un Hammerhead in 2 ture consecutive, m-am gandit ca e cam imba si ca o armata de Nidz cu 2 Flying Tyrants si 3 Harpies ar putea cu usurinta sa distruga orice mech army with impunity.
Asta se intampla cand cuplezi Vector strike (D3+1 hits against any unit over which the FMC passes over) cu Smash (halve attacks but get double strength, AP2 and get re-rolls for armour penetration) ceea ce inseamna ca se pot distruge cu usurinta cam orice vehicule de pe sol sau din aer cu AV12 sau mai putin pe side (adica cam orice in afara de Land raiders, monoliths and the odd Demolisher or AV13 walkers out there, and even those can fall with a little luck).

Din fericire pt. victime ceilalti acest lucru este incorect deoarece:
Loviturile vector strike se rezolva la strength-ul unmodified al FMC-ului.
Sooooo,no Smash during vector strike resulting in being much harder to destroy a vehicle that is >=AV11.
Enjoy!

Si revin la intrebarea precedenta: MC nu mai primesc 2d6 armour penetration?

Kelvon a scris:Si revin la intrebarea precedenta: MC nu mai primesc 2d6 armour penetration?

Nu.

Damnit. Da presupun ca se compenseaza cu Slam Attacku ala sau cum ii zice.
PS. Dai de baut la al 500-lea post?

Clarificare pt. ca am impresia ca nu folosim barrage weapons (gen master of ordnance) corect contra vehiculelor.
Barrage weapons lovesc intodeauna side-ul vehiculului, indiferent de unde se afla firer-ul sau unde este centrul gaurii.

Deci poa sa fie centrul template-ului in spatele unui vehicul ca tot in side dai armor pen si nu in rear.

Edit: Regula simuleaza arcing fire si faptul ca proiectilul loveste in armura de sus care, desi nu este reprezentata in stats-ul vehiculelor ca valoare, in toate editiile a fost mentionata ca fiind egala cu side-ul.

Si daca centrul marker-ului nu este pe vehicul dar o portiune din marker e se considera full strength hit?

Kelvon a scris:Si daca centrul marker-ului nu este pe vehicul dar o portiune din marker e se considera full strength hit?

Mda. Go go pie plate army